Thursday, June 11, 2009

Back to Work: My PMUA Proposal for Positive Change

Dear friends,

Now that the spring primary season is over, it is time to get back to work on the issues we have been discussing for several months now. Back in March of this year, I presented a very clear and detailed vision for Plainfield that included reining in the PMUA and providing tax relief to property owners.

As I walked this city and talked with Plainfield residents, the most compelling issue at hand was the issue of the PMUA's outrageous rate increases and insensitivity to the ratepayers as they took expensive trips to conferences completely unrelated to their mission, the last one to the tune of about $25,000.

At that time, I articulated a plan that would bring the PMUA under the city’s umbrella, thus having all PMUA charges included in the property tax bill of Plainfield property owners. In addition, my plan would protect the frontline employees, and rid homeowners of the unfair, revenue-generating "cart fees" that we all have found so onerous.

I continue to receive substantial email from you, the ratepayers, about the wasteful spending and lack of transparency at the PMUA, and I want to assure you that I will be taking action immediately. That means now.

The lack of accountability on the part of the PMUA leadership offended the sensibilities of virtually every resident I met. I spoke with many of you about my intention to draft a resolution to ensure that the Plainfield city council, which has some say in what the PMUA does, takes action. The council has a fiduciary responsibility to the residents of Plainfield to make sure that each commissioner seeking appointment is thoroughly vetted and does not have any conflicts of interest in serving. Further, most companies cut back on conference travel and other questionable expenses as belt-tightening measures during troubled economic times. The PMUA should do the same, so I will follow through on a proposal to cut all travel until the PMUA makes clear its policies on such.

I will be asking my council colleagues to stand with me on this issue and support passage of my resolution. I look forward to your comments.

Regards,

Adrian

Thank You for Your Support

Dear Friends,

I wanted to take a moment to thank you for your support during my mayoral campaign. I will be individually thanking all those who worked day and night on behalf of me and the New Democrats for Plainfield, but I wanted to give a community "shout out" to all the residents who came out to vote. Although we did not prevail, your energy and enthusiasm touched me deeply. I congratulated the mayor on her successful renomination as the Democratic candidate. And congratulations also to Bridget Rivers, who successfully ran for the 4th Ward city council seat. I look forward to having Bridget on the council with the rest of our colleagues. Now it is time for all of us to get back to work on YOUR behalf!

Regards, Adrian

Saturday, May 30, 2009

On Our Responsibility to Plainfield

There is a maxim in the journalistic profession that teaches “it’s better to sin by omission than by commission.” As a public servant, it is probably safe for me to say that it’s better to sin by commission than by omission. As residents and as stakeholders, we must all commit to making Plainfield a better place; we must commit to eternal vigilance, greater participation, and to be keepers of our brothers and sisters; they are our neighbors and friends.

As residents and community-minded individuals, we have an obligation not only to ourselves and our families but to our community as well. We have a fiduciary duty to protect our city for the benefit of the next generation, who will be the heirs to an inheritance that can only flourish and grow if protected by leaders who are willing to be strong in the face of mounting pressures from forces of the City’s harsh economic realities.

Our leaders must be willing to put themselves on the line for the greater good and must never allow their personal self-interest to be elevated above the interest of the people. They must not allow forces of the prevailing winds to divide and conquer so that they appear compromised and neutralized. We must all work together.

As guardians of our fate, our duty is to hold all elected officials accountable and to the very highest standard of ethics, professionalism, and job performance. We must see to it that partnerships exist amongst all stakeholders within our community--the faith community, the Board of Education, and the block and neighborhood associations--in order to create a better Plainfield.

We must stand as one unified community without a need for uniformity, and we must be willing to disagree without being disagreeable. And, although this requires us to be defenders if and when necessary, and ebullient with praise when deserving, it also places on us a duty to be constructively critical of our leaders when warranted.

The failures of the current administration over the past three and a half years cannot be ignored; such failures should energize voters to go to the polls in droves on Tuesday June 2nd to vote for the change that is needed to move the city forward. Many are they who would have you believe that cooperation has in its recipe the ingredients of uniformity, blind faith and allegiance to a political boss, a feeble desire to disagree, a weakened state of being, and no back bone.

I believe that a spirit of cooperation can be achieved without trading our morals and our values. Unity can exist without uniformity and for us to cooperate doesn’t mean that we must capitulate. I have every confidence that we will work together for a better Plainfield, and that though a forward thrust might have been temporarily slowed by the failures of the current administration, our vision for our city will not be derailed and we will remain focused and on track.

I will always be “for the cause that needs assistance; against the wrongs that need resistance; for the future in the distance, and the good that I [we] can do.”

I urge you to come out next Tuesday and vote for me, Adrian Mapp, Rick Smiley, and the entire New Democratic team in column F, vote for change; vote for Plainfield’s future.

Regards, Adrian O. Mapp
3rd Ward Councilman
President, New Democrats for Plainfield

Thursday, May 28, 2009

On Public Safety and Residents' Concerns

On Tuesday, May 26th, Mayor Sharon Robinson-Briggs felt the need to call a press conference in a feeble attempt to refute the crime data reported in the Uniform Crime statistics by the Plainfield Police Department, data that clearly demonstrates an increase in crime of 12.4%. As I walk the streets of our city speaking with homeowners, many have expressed grave concerns about their personal safety as a result of the reported burglaries, home invasions, assaults, car break-ins, and car thefts as well as other crimes that affect their quality of life.

Yet, whenever the issue of crime comes up, the Mayor prides herself in disseminating misleading information that she ought to know is factually incorrect and statistically impossible. For example, she likes to claim that murders are down by 300%. The mayor should know that if she has 15 marbles and she loses all fifteen, she has lost 100 % and would not have any more marbles to lose. In other words, she would have lost all of her marbles.

Another piece of misleading information the mayor has disseminated is her claim that she hired more police officers since taking office on January 01, 2006. Not true!

Here are the FACTS, provided by her own cabinet members, City Administrator Marc Dashield and Police Director Martin Hellwig: when the mayor took office in 2006, there were 151 police officers in the Plainfield Police Department; 95 lived outside of Plainfield, and 56 lived in Plainfield. Today, in 2009, there are only 146 police officers on the force, a decrease of 5 officers since the mayor took office.

In 2004, the city council, of which I was a member, made cuts in the budgets of several departments in an effort to control costs and rising taxes so as to ease the burden on Plainfield’s taxpayers. At the time, the Plainfield Police Department had a duplicate medical prescription plan that was costing Plainfield tax payers $350,000 a year—this plan was not being used by its members. The previous administration and the council had tried, unsuccessfully, to convince the PBA to give up the duplicate prescription plan in an effort to save the jobs of some of its members. The refusal of the PBA leadership at the time to compromise and save the jobs of its own members resulted in the administration having to layoff 8 officers, bringing the number down to 151.

I have had numerous conversations with residents over the last six months regarding their quality of life concerns, and one thing that was made very clear to me is that people don’t feel safe. I intend to address this concern as Plainfield’s next mayor. Plainfield needs a new beginning; we cannot allow ourselves to be stuck in the past—we must move forward. I intend to live up to my promise, with support from the council, to bring the number of police officers up to 160.

I will pay for these additional officers with the savings from retirements and attrition and the dollars made available in America’s Recovery and Reinvestment Act signed into office by President Obama. My hand will be open and I will reach out to the leadership of the Police Department and to its union to initiate dialogue and to create a partnership based on mutual respect.

As we approach the end of this campaign season, I ask the voters of Plainfield to reject desperate last-minute attempts by the mayor and her supporters to skirt the truth. She has had a whole mayoral term to make good on her promises, and she has come up empty. She has shown that she lacks the capacity to do the math:

12.4 % crime increase
+ 20 % PMUA increase
- 5 police officers
+ 1 closed hospital while the mayor was on the board and said nothing
= a failed administration.


As President of the New Democrats for Plainfield, I am committed to continuing the New Democrats' legacy of ethical, honest leadership for Plainfield’s future. I ask you to give me the opportunity to carry out my vision for the city so that I can deliver the change that is needed. I will govern with an open mind, an open heart, and with care and compassion. On June 2nd, remember to vote for me, Adrian Mapp, and the entire New Democrat team in column F. Vote for change—vote for Plainfield’s Future.

Regards, Adrian

Wednesday, May 27, 2009

Mapp for Mayor: Leadership for Plainfield's Future

Today, I am premiering my campaign video. I want to thank everyone whose time, talent, and dedication made it possible. I encourage you to share it with all of our friends and supporters.

The New Democrats for Plainfield continue a LEGACY of ETHICAL, HONEST LEADERSHIP in Plainfield. With your help, we can bring POSITIVE CHANGE to the Queen City on June 2.

VOTE COLUMN F.

Regards, Adrian

Tuesday, May 26, 2009

Plainfield Seniors: Friends and Family











We are blessed with a wonderful, active senior population here in Plainfield. I am committed to making sure that we provide for their lifestyle and security. These elders have much to teach us. While attending some recent public Plainfield-area events, I chatted with several friends who are on the ballot with Rick Smiley and me, running for the Plainfield Democratic City Committee with the New Democrats for Plainfield.

Pictured with Rick and me, you may recognize the following New Democrat City Committee Candidates: Dorothy Henry (Ward 2-District 7), Donald Van Blake (Ward 2-District 5), Leroy Canady (Ward 3-District 5) and Barbara Wallace (Ward 3-District 5).

Sunday, May 24, 2009

On Economic Development for the 21st Century

As we move forward into the final week of our campaign, I will again be posting my long-term vision for making Plainfield a stronger, healthier community, focusing on the specifics of how I plan to make that vision a reality. It can only be done through partnership with you, my fellow residents of Plainfield. Today, I will focus on economic development in the 21st Century.

I will create a plan for economic development that is not developer driven, and for the first time in this city’s history I will develop and implement an aggressive marketing plan using the mass media to enhance Plainfield’s image, making it more desirable to targeted investors who will want to make Plainfield a business destination.

But I will not focus solely on attracting new businesses; I want to retain the ones that are already here. I want to give them a reason to stay and to expand. So, I am proposing the creation of a Commercial Tax Abatement Program that will not alter the underlying assessment, yet will provide a very attractive incentive over a five-year period to encourage existing businesses to expand, thus creating jobs and expanding the city’s commercial tax base to enhance its tax revenues.

Transit Village Initiative
I strongly believe that the Transit Village initiative can be the lynchpin for downtown revitalization and consequently the revitalization of Plainfield. The Transit Village will allow us to increase the density of housing and businesses in areas already well-served by public transportation.

Couple this with a long-term initiative to encourage artists, crafts people, and small businesses to make use of the under-utilized loft-type structures already existing within the proximity of Plainfield’s downtown transit zone, and we have the makings of a critical mass of self-sustaining activities and development that will restore vitality to Plainfield’s downtown while at the same time providing the city with an ever-increasing tax base of new ratables.

Brownfields
I will initiate a new study of all Brownfield structures within the city, using grant funds, and establish a plan that rehabilitates and converts all of the Brownfield structures, mainly concentrated in the 4th Ward, into retail shopping outlets. I recognize that these are very challenging fiscal times for all municipalities, but I also believe that we as a community can and must take every step necessary to position Plainfield for success when the nation comes out of this difficult time.

The city should not, and I will not, place all of our eggs in one development basket. As a city, we must broaden our approach and our outreach. This I plan to do. I will focus as much of the city’s resources to rebuilding, improving and enhancing our infrastructure—our roads, IT network, and aging buildings, and I will aggressively seek and demand funding from the County, State and Federal governments to assist us in this effort.

Information Technology
Moving forward, I will work to modernize Information Technology (IT); it must be brought into the 21st century, it has to be made more efficient and citizen friendly. By automating the city records and putting them on-line, using wireless, the Web and GPS, we can make doing the city’s business, easier, faster, and less expensive for citizens, businesses and employees.

Renewables
By embracing renewables, Plainfield will be able to significantly reduce its carbon footprint. My colleague Cory Storch has long been an advocate for hybrid vehicles. Well, Cory, I’ve got a plan for you. My plan, where feasible, will be to migrate the city’s fleet of vehicles to hybrid gas and electric, all electric and biodiesel; install solar panels on city buildings; encourage citizens through the use of targeted initiatives to embrace renewables, thus reducing their carbon footprint. We can partner with the school system to make sure our kids learn the technology that will enable them to take advantage of the new jobs created in the renewable industry. This is a serious commitment, one that will ultimately drive down costs and result in more citizens embracing their environmental stewardship.

Regards,

Adrian

Thursday, May 21, 2009

On Good Government and Ethical Leadership

Plainfield is blessed with having highly capable employees who are seriously interested and committed to moving the City forward through their daily efforts. However, due to the lack of leadership, they are not being heard. This has hurt the city tremendously, because it is the frontline employees who are often in the best position to identify cost savings and to suggest changes that can benefit the City. As Mayor, my administration will utilize the employees of the City as partners in Government.

My administration will empower the city employees to implement changes that are beneficial to the city and will create faster response times to addressing issues plaguing the city. My administration will not be the dictatorial form of government that is practiced by the current mayor in Plainfield today; my government will be inclusive of ALL people.

A strong and effective government is one that is built on CONSENSUS. Great leaders, from Abraham Lincoln to President Barack Obama, believed in the involvement of the ordinary citizen and worker towards the creation of a more sound and responsive government.

That is what Good leadership and good government looks like. That is what I will be as the Mayor. Real change can come to Plainfield, but it requires REAL leadership. I will provide that leadership with you as my partner, as my team member, and certainly as my check and balance.

Regards,

Adrian

Tuesday, May 19, 2009

On Crime and Public Safety: A Clarification

Captain El-Amin's comment on my previous post regarding the mayor's inaction on crime and public safety deserves clarification. It turns out that the very competitive COPS grant I referred to in an earlier post was applied for by the administration by the deadline, but without council knowledge or approval. This means that the administration failed once again in its fiduciary and legal responsibility to keep the governing body informed about all significant grants that will be applied for.

This instance highlights the continued failure of this mayor to communicate with the council except in a rushed, haphazard, and last-minute way. The governing body is supposed to approve grant applications before they are sent out—failure to communicate with us about this grant is par for the course of this administration, which clearly feels it does not have to be transparent and accountable to the people or the governing body of Plainfield.

The resolution the captain is referring to is a blanket resolution that I proposed—one that would enable the police to apply for significant grants through President Obama’s Stimulus Plan in a timely fashion without the city having to suffer from waiting until the last minute. The reason I proposed this resolution was to ensure that the administration would not wait until the last minute (as is their standard operating procedure) to file for certain grants.

It is the ethical responsibility of the mayor to fully and openly communicate with the governing body about all grants. To say that “The application was submitted on-line electronically by the deadline” WITHOUT council approval just highlights the lack of accountability on the part of the administration.

That said, our police force deserves the full support of the governing body, the administration, and our community. A Mapp administration would ensure that all grants are applied for and that the city council and the public remain informed about all crime fighting efforts in a timely fashion.

Regards,
Adrian

Friday, May 15, 2009

On Crime and Public Safety

This post is also published on my 3rd Ward Council blog, "Mapping It Out," as I felt that it deserved posting there as well. Many of you have expressed frustration about the lack of communication from the mayor as well as outrage about her attempt to govern with "hugs" and "kisses," but no meaningful action.

Statistics produced by the Union County Prosecutor's Office just last month show that crime is UP 12.4% in Plainfield.* This is shameful, and speaks to the current administration's empty talk on crime and safety.

I know first-hand how crime affects us all. As I walk through the streets of Plainfield, listening to you, the voters, it is clear that the current administration under Sharon is deaf to your serious concerns about your own safety.

There is a misconception being perpetrated by my opponent that my goal is to reduce the police department. Nothing could be further from the truth. The truth is, we have less police on the force than 3 ½ years ago, when this mayor came into office. In addition, more losses were caused by the fact that the mayor had officers personally assigned to her for her use for 3 years—meaning even less officers available for crime-fighting!

As your mayor, I will fight crime like never before! My goal is to add additional police officers to city streets by bringing the complement of officers up to 160. I will use the savings that will result from attrition and retirements and funds available under President Obama’s Federal Stimulus program to accomplish this goal.

For example, up to $1 billion in funding from President Obama’s American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 was made available through the COPS (Community Oriented Policing Services) to address the personnel needs of state, local, and tribal law enforcement.

The funding, through COPS Hiring Recovery Program (CHRP) goes directly to law enforcement agencies to create and preserve jobs and to increase community policing capacity and crime-prevention efforts through the hiring and rehiring of law enforcement officers.

The grant would have provided 100 percent funding for salaries and benefits for 3 years for newly-hired, full-time sworn officer positions (including filling existing unfunded vacancies) or for rehired officers who have been laid off, or are scheduled to be laid off on a future date, as a result of local budget cuts.

Unfortunately, the current administration dropped the ball and did not apply for this competitive grant! The deadline, April 14, 2009, has passed!

This is truly unfortunate, because there was no local matching fund requirement, meaning no additional tax burden on you, the taxpayer. In addition, no cap was placed on the number of positions we could have requested for funding!

Under a Mapp administration, we will apply for ALL available funding to increase safety and improve crime prevention! We will make sure that every dollar allocated for crime fighting is spent on crimefighting. Working with our police, we must tackle drug dealing, assaults, home invasions, car break-ins, and all other criminal activity. We must be vigilant.

We’ve had enough empty talk from the current administration about crime. We will not drop the ball and ignore the needs of our residents as the current mayor has done. We will not place our heads in the sand. Under Sharon, crime has steadily increased.

It’s time for action! It’s time for change!


*Source: Star-Ledger, 4/21/09 “New statistics show crime surge in Union County last year”: In Plainfield, second in the county to Elizabeth in total number of crimes...crime rose 12.4% percent.” Statistics provided by the Uniform Police Report to the Union County Prosecutor's Office.

Friday, May 8, 2009

PMUA and Jerry Green

Dear friends,

I have been receiving a great deal of correspondence from residents who are supportive of my plan to rein in expenses at PMUA, along with questions as to why Jerry Green has resorted to unsubstantiated lies in order to defame my character.

I find it perplexing that, instead of dealing with the unprecedented 20% plus rate increase at PMUA and the questionable expenses related to a recent trip to California made by several commissioners and executives that we as PMUA ratepayers are funding, Jerry Green has instead decided to engage in libel about what was said at a meeting with PMUA Director Eric Watson.

Director Watson has not contacted me about the assemblyman's lies, although Green's blog post implies that Watson told him what was said at this meeting. Watson has not publicly come out to validate Green's lies or to correct the record, so I must. I would hope that Director Watson would make clear his role, if any, in Green's melodrama.

With the kind permission of its author, what follows is sample correspondence from one of the emails I received from a PMUA ratepayer who has become very concerned about Jerry Green's recent attack on me. My final response, sent yesterday, is immediately below:

Re: In Plainfield, it costs more to flush than to drink...pee water v. potable water‏
From: Adrian Mapp (amapp4mayor@gmail.com)
Sent: Thu 5/07/09 1:19 AM
To: Sandro La Rosa
(sandro.larosa@gmail.com)

Sandro:

Assembly Green will do everything he can to spread lies and misinformation about me over the course of the next 4 weeks. I can assure you that I made no such promise to Mr. Watson.

Everything Jerry said is a lie; I stand by my very public position on the PMUA; I am a man of my word. Please do not allow Mr. Green's attempt to tarnish my credibility and reputation to succeed.

There will be many of these attacks during the next 26 days, please reject them. When I met with Mr. Watson I did so with Annie McWilliams and Nat Singleton; they can attest to the fact that no such offer was ever made. Fortunately I never meet with anyone by myself.

Having said the above I will say the following: In 2005 my late friend and former mayor Al Mcwilliams was attacked repeatedly by Mr. Green and he spent a lot of energy responding to those attacks instead of focusing his energy and resources on his opponent, Sharon.

It was a big mistake. Al lost the election. Jerry's strategy worked. With all due respect, I have no plans to engage Jerry or to respond to his lies, I will remain focused.

I am running against Sharon not against Jerry. I need your help in order to defeat her and to be in a position to bring positive change to Plainfield.

That said, rest assured that I remain true to my stated goal of reining in the PMUA and lifting the burden that it places on all of the property owners in Plainfield.

I have no allegiance to Mr. Watson, my allegiance and commitment is to you and to the rest of Plainfield. I don't owe Mr. Watson anything and I did not promise him anything but, I will promise you this, with your support I will rein in the PMUA.

Regards,
Adrian


On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Sandro La Rosa <sandro.larosa@gmail.com> wrote:

Adrian:I came across this piece by Assemblyman Jerry Greenhttp://jerrygreenspage.blogspot.com/2009/04/city-committee-chairmanship-up-for-sale.html

Mr. Green writes"A few months ago, Adrian Mapp met with the Director of the PMUA, EricWatson. Adrian Mapp solicited to Mr. Watson that if he [Watson]encouraged the election of Adrian Mapp for Mayor, he would not only close his eyes to PMUA’s problems, but would also support Watson as the new Chairman of the Democratic Party of the City of Plainfield. "These are grave accusations, given your public position on the PMUA.

I believe that many Plainfield citizens are fed up with the PMUA and are willing to support you in the upcoming elections for Mayor, given your past statements on your willingness to rein on the PMUA. We found the allegation raised by Mr. Green very disturbing and expect you to strongly rebuke this accusation.

Thank you for your attention and best regards, Sandro

On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Adrian Mapp <amapp4mayor@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello Sandro:

Thank you for your email and the copy of the letter you sent to the PMUA. Rest assured that as mayor I will be looking at the overall cost structure of the PMUA with a view towards reducing its financial burden on tax payers. Again, thanks for the feedback.

Regards, Adrian

On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Sandro La Rosa <sandro.larosa@gmail.com wrote:

Dear Mr. Mapp:

I read with interest your OpEd on the PMUA http://www.mycentraljersey.com/article/20090310/OPINION04/903100339/1063 and I am fully suppostive of your proposal to dismantle the PMUA, eliminate redundant and costly layers of management, rationalize the service, and - as a result - provide much-needed relief to the workers and to the Plainfield rate/tax-payers. As for the current burden to the tax payers, I noticed that you focused mainly on the solid waste issues. I wanted you to be aware that I found another major problem, having to do with the absurd sewer fee charged by the PMUA. For details, you may want to read the attached letter I sent to PMUA in February - not replied yet - after finding out that flush water in Plainfield costs 170% of potable water. It took me a while to figure this out because PMUA does not disclose the measurement unit of their sewer rate. I eventually was able to calculate back that these are $/hundred ft3. In my case, I have to pay $5.78 for sewer v. $3.36/100 ft3 I paid on average to my water supply company. As my visiting daughter pointed out, "If sewer water in Plainfield is so precious, maybe I should start drinking from the toilet." It sounds comical but I believe it is a very serious issue for Plainfield residents.

Best regards, Sandro

End Correspondence

Folks,

I am running against the current mayor and her record of failed leadership. I am running against wasteful spending and mismanagement at City Hall and PMUA.

I am running for Mayor to restore transparency, fiscal accountability, and stable taxes to our city.

With your support, we can change the negative, divisive, unethical "Jerry Green-style politics" of lies and polarization.

Regards,

Adrian


On June 2, you can make a change.
Vote Column F
Mapp for Mayor
Smiley for Assembly
New Democrats City Committee Candidates

Monday, May 4, 2009

My Take on Muhlenberg Hospital

Last year, while campaigning on behalf of Barack Obama and the New Democrats for Plainfield, we laid out an approach to saving Muhlenberg Hospital. As I walk through your neighborhoods, meeting with you and hearing your concerns, Muhlenberg comes up frequently. Although the hospital has closed, there is no reason it cannot be reopened immediately as a full-service facility. I thought that now would be an opportune time to remind us all of what can and should be done:

Muhlenberg Regional Medical Center is a medical, economic, and social centerpiece of the Plainfield community. It is a medical institution highly regarded by its patients and by the medical professional community. The state commission appointed by Governor John Corzine for “Rationalizing Health Care” clearly identified Muhlenberg as an essential hospital serving a community with great needs, in contrast to other hospital service areas that have more beds than are being used. This commission recommends using state funding to support hospitals like Muhlenberg while closing hospitals that are less needed.

In order to save Muhlenberg and the essential medical services it provides, solutions must address root causes, i.e., the 1.5 million New Jersey residents who lack any form of medical insurance. The greater Plainfield area has a significant portion of New Jersey’s uninsured, and most of them need insurance, not only to pay for inpatient care, but more importantly, to pay for preventative, wellness, and primary outpatient care. More insured residents will result in less unnecessary and expensive emergency room visits and less inpatient care. This is the future of medicine and Muhlenberg should be the focal point for these new trends in medicine.

Muhlenberg can continue to be a leader for medical services to those who desperately need them. We need to take the following steps to make this happen:
  • State government should provide cash infusion of $18 million from the charity care account for a one-year period to give Muhlenberg time for more lasting solutions. This is in the spirit of the state’s commission on Rationalizing Health Care.
  • Along this line, a hospital stabilization fund must be created to save distressed but essential NJ hospitals. Muhlenberg must be the first participant in this fund.
  • State Senator Vitale’s Universal Healthcare legislation should be fast-tracked to provide all New Jerseyans with the healthcare we need and deserve. All legislators serving the Muhlenberg community should sign on as co-sponsors of this bill.
  • Charity Care funding must be used rationally. This can only be done if hospital financial records are readily available for public scrutiny, so as to make community hospitals such as Muhlenberg transparent and accountable to the community.
  • Annual Financial Statements must be provided in a timely manner to any citizen who requests them. Additionally, annual public hearings for each NJ hospital should be required for full disclosure of its financial position.
  • Charity care fund distribution should include reimbursements to reward efficiency and quality. This will clearly benefit Muhlenberg.

We know what it will take to save Muhlenberg.

What is needed is the political will to do it.
Regards, Adrian

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Column F: Leadership for Plainfield's Future

Dear Friends,

A judge has decided the outcome of our court case. The New Democrats for Plainfield City Committee Candidates and I will be allowed to be bracketed with Rick Smiley, Assembly Candidate.

In addition, the City Clerk's decision on the petition challenges we filed was upheld. We have received clarification, and will now move forward!

New Democrats for Plainfield

COLUMN F

Leadership for Plainfield's

FUTURE!

Monday, April 27, 2009

Towards a Fair Democratic Election Process









Dear Friends,

This morning, I appeared in court to receive a final ruling on issues that came up at the beginning of the primary process. One issue was the issue of bracketing, which Dan Damon wrote about in his blog. The New Democrats for Plainfield wanted to be bracketed to run with some other reform candidates, so there was a hearing with Judge William Wertheimer, who presided.

The other issue had to do with making sure that the petitions filed by all candidates for Plainfield Mayor (myself included!) met the legal requirements set forth by New Jersey election law statutes. As you all know, the petition process is designed so that voters can be assured that the candidates running for an election adhere to the same democratic process and to ensure fairness for all. In addition, the process of getting valid signatures is meant to ensure that no legal voter is disenfranchised.

After the City Clerk received the signed petitions, she notified the candidates regarding all deadlines relating to the ballot, letting us know that if we had questions or concerns about any of the signatures of voters and others who signed the petitions, we had note them and get them to her so that she could check them.
I went over the petitions of my opponents, just as I am sure they went over mine, and I submitted some challenges. It is the Clerk's responsibility to respond to petition questions from the candidates. After her review, the Clerk upheld some my challenges, as some registered Republicans had signed some of the pink-colored Democratic petitions given to them by candidates (the Republican petitions are blue), and there were a few unregistered voters who had signed in error. For the other challenges, the Clerks said said that a judge would have to make a final ruling if there were still questions.

One question that I had was whether unaffiliated (also known as Non-Partisan) voters could sign partisan petitions to run for City Committee and to be counted as valid on a partisan primary petition; the Clerk had indicated to me that unaffiliated voters had to sign a party affiliation form and attach it to the petition. One of our city committee candidates did this, per the Clerk’s advice. Later, the Clerk noted that by signing a partisan petition (Democratic or Republican Party), the voter was declaring his or her party affiliation, per New Jersey election statutes. I am glad that this was clarified.

Another clarification we needed had to do with petitioners who had neglected to sign their names, per the Clerk's instructions, as well as some whose signatures appeared similar. Although Judge Wertheimer noted some of the similarities and expressed his own concerns about the handwriting on a couple of petitions, he stipulated that, as he was not a handwriting expert, and no handwriting expert was present in court, he would accept the oaths signed by and sworn to by the candidates.

A final issue that came up is one of grave concern to me. When one of the other candidates spoke to the judge, he rightly noted that some of the County Clerk’s lists were outdated, as one of his family members (who IS registered) was listed as “not a registered voter” by the City Clerk. Now, I have known this candidate and his family for over twenty years. He has been an elected official and he and his family are longtime residents of Plainfield, so I found it difficult to believe that a family member of his would be unregistered.

Because of the outdated lists, however, there is a danger that other Plainfield voters, like the voter mentioned above, will now have to get their names reregistered with the Clerk. The lists need to be updated so that this mistake doesn’t happen in the future. We want to make sure that no voter is disenfranchised.

I am glad that we received these rulings by Judge Wertheimer, as all of us running for elective office can feel secure knowing that these two rulings are final. With that said, I look forward to a vigorous and challenging campaign season!

New Democrats for Plainfield
COLUMN F
Leadership for Plainfield's
FUTURE!

Regards,

Adrian

Friday, April 24, 2009

My Vision for Plainfield



Friends, below is the text of the remarks I made at the grand opening of Plainfield's New Democrats for Plainfield Headquarters last Saturday, April 18, 2009.



Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for coming out this afternoon. I realize that your time is precious and I feel blessed that you took the time to be with me at this important juncture in the history of the city of Plainfield.

Many of you in this room have asked me why I have decided to run for the position of Mayor. And I say to you that I am running for mayor of Plainfield because the city is in crisis. It needs a leader with the experience, qualification, track record and vision to lead it out of the dark days of a failed leadership under the current administration: a failed leadership that has brought the city three years of economic stagnation, three years of benign neglect of its infrastructure, and three years of bad personnel choices incapable of managing the fiscal affairs of this city, incapable of delivering quality core services, and incapable of responding to the needs of citizens in these very harsh economic times.

I am running for mayor to address these and other issues affecting Plainfield. I have the experience and expertise to do so—I hold an M.B.A. in International Business, a Bachelor’s Degree in Accounting, and I am a Certified Municipal Finance Officer.

Ladies and gentlemen, I have a vision for Plainfield that will be built from the ground up—not from the top down. So, I would like to take some time today to highlight where I, as Mayor, will take the city of Plainfield.

Plainfield is blessed with having highly capable employees who are seriously interested and committed to moving the City forward through their daily efforts. However, due to the lack of leadership, they are not being heard. This has hurt the city tremendously, because it is the frontline employees who are often in the best position to identify cost savings and to suggest changes that can benefit the City.

As Mayor, my administration will utilize the employees of the City as partners in Government, for many of them are also residents of Plainfield, and they truly wish to see a more prosperous city. This is where their primary investment, their homes, will appreciate in value.

My administration will empower the city employees to implement changes that are beneficial to the city and will create faster response times to addressing issues plaguing the city.

My administration will not be the dictatorial form of government that is practiced by the current Mayor in Plainfield today; my government will be inclusive of ALL people. A strong and effective government is one that is built on CONSENSUS. Great leaders, from Abraham Lincoln to President Barack Obama, believed in the involvement of the ordinary citizen and worker towards the creation of a more sound and responsive government.

That is what Good leadership and good government looks like. That is what I will be as the Mayor. Real change can come to Plainfield, but it requires REAL leadership. I will provide that leadership with you as my partner, as my team member, and certainly as my check and balance.

I will create a plan for economic development that is not developer driven, and for the first time in this city’s history I will develop and implement an aggressive marketing plan using the mass media to enhance Plainfield’s image, making it more desirable to targeted investors who will want to make Plainfield a business destination.

But I will not focus solely on attracting new businesses; I want to retain the ones that are already here. I want to give them a reason to stay and to expand. So, I am proposing the creation of a Commercial Tax Abatement Program that will not alter the underlying assessment, yet will provide a very attractive incentive over a five year period that will encourage existing businesses to expand, thus creating jobs and expanding the city’s commercial tax base to enhance its tax revenues.

I strongly believe that the Transit Village initiative can be the lynchpin for downtown revitalization and consequently the revitalization of Plainfield. The Transit Village will allow us to increase the density of housing and businesses in areas already well-served by public transportation.

Couple this with a long term initiative to encourage artists, crafts people and small businesses to make use of the under-utilized loft-type structures already existing within the proximity of Plainfield’s downtown transit zone, and we have the makings of a critical mass of self-sustaining activities and development that will restore vitality to Plainfield’s downtown while at the same time providing the city with an ever-increasing tax base of new ratables.

I will initiate a new study of all Brownfield structures within the city, using grant funds, and establish a plan that rehabilitates and converts all of the Brownfield structures, mainly concentrated in the 4th Ward, into retail shopping outlets.

I recognize that these are very challenging fiscal times for all municipalities, but I also believe that we as a community can and must take every step necessary to position the City for success when the nation comes out of this difficult time.
The city should not and I will not place all of our eggs in one development basket, as a city we must broaden our approach and our outreach. This I plan to do.

I will focus as much of the city’s resources to rebuilding, improving and enhancing our infrastructure—our roads, IT network, and aging buildings, and I will aggressively seek and demand funding from the County, State and Federal governments to assist us in this effort.

Moving forward, I will work to modernize Information Technology (IT); it must be brought into the 21st century, it has to be made more efficient and citizen friendly. By automating the city records and putting them on-line, using wireless, the Web and GPS, we can make doing the city’s business, easier, faster, and less expensive for citizens, businesses and employees.

By embracing renewables, Plainfield will be able to significantly reduce its carbon footprint. My colleague Cory Storch has long been an advocate for hybrid vehicles. Well, Cory, I’ve got a plan for you. My plan, where feasible, will be to migrate the city’s fleet of vehicles to hybrid gas and electric, all electric and biodiesel; install solar panels on city buildings; encourage citizens through the use of targeted initiatives to embrace renewables, thus reducing their carbon footprint.

We can partner with the school system to make sure our kids learn the technology that will enable them to take advantage of the new jobs created in the renewable industry. This is a serious commitment, one that will ultimately drive down costs and result in more citizens embracing their environmental stewardship.

There is a misconception out there being perpetrated that my goal is to reduce the police department. Well, nothing could be further from the truth. My goal is to add additional police officers to city streets by bringing the complement of officers up to 160. I will use the savings that will result from attrition and retirements and funds available under President Obama’s Federal Stimulus program to accomplish this goal.

My administration will focus on quality of life issues such as drugs and crime, traffic safety, enforcement of property maintenance codes, and neighborhood safety and appearance.

The PMUA is an issue that is on many peoples’ minds, as it should be. Higher assessments mean less money in your pocket. I am not here to attack the PMUA or its great employees. However, as your Mayor, I will appoint a commission to explore the feasibility of bringing the PMUA under the umbrella of city government. My goal is to utilize economies of scale that would help to reduce operating costs, provide additional tax deductions to property owners, and protect frontline employees.

Across America, cities are finding ways to save money, and they are doing this by identifying city services best suited for shared service partnerships, shared services that will seek out balanced partnerships with local governmental entities, neighboring municipalities and with the county.

For example, the city’s Municipal Court, its 9-1-1 dispatch system, its regular phone system, and the Tax Collector’s office are some of the areas where opportunities for shared services exist.

It doesn’t mean that people will lose their jobs. What it means is that we are using the resources of this city in a more thoughtful and efficient manner, and perhaps opening up a long neglected opportunity to bring in money to the city.

Here’s where everyone can get involved in moving Plainfield forward. In my first one hundred days, I will establish focus groups that will be charged with the responsibility of reaching across the city to hear what all the citizens of Plainfield envision in their city. I will ask them about their vision for the city and their assistance to move Plainfield forward.

Secondly, I will appoint a Census Commission to work on getting an accurate count of our city’s population. The goal would be to exceed 50,000 citizens – I know that we have that many Plainfielders; we just have to make sure that they are counted.

By exceeding the 50,000 mark, we, as a city, control the funding that Plainfield is rightly due, as a city we would no longer be beholden to any outside forces. The phrase that comes to mind is Plainfield for Plainfield.

The residents of Plainfield are homeowners and renters. Some of our residents work in the city of Plainfield while others travel great distances to earn their wages. What every resident of Plainfield wants is a well-functioning city that understands the value of the hard earned dollar that they make and, as such, treat the taxes raised through property taxes and the taxes receive in the form of municipal aid as a sacred trust that should be expended with discipline and in a fiduciary manner.

I will use my financial background to restore fiscal stability, integrity and accountability to the city’s finances.

As a fellow resident of Plainfield, I appreciate the great potential of this City. However, I believe it is time we make that great potential a reality.

We deserve a progressive, forward-thinking government that understands how to make smart financial decisions that benefit of the City.

My experience as a Certified Public Accountant, as an Associate Director of Finance, and as a Municipal Finance Officer has taught me how to analyze the financial conditions of both cities and businesses to provide financial solutions to help them attain their goals while adhering to their budgets.

As Mayor, my administration will create a budget that incorporates the pressing needs of the city, such as road repairs, and address those needs in the budget that prepared by the administration.

We will prioritize expenditures, based on the benefits they provide to citizens, and not be afraid to make the hard choices.

As mayor, I will seek out and take advantage of all available resources at the county, state and federal levels to benefit the people of Plainfield.

I will surround myself with competent local talent and I will work to create a culture of volunteerism and responsibility on the part of city employees and citizens all across the city.

As mayor, I will work to make courtesy, professionalism and respect the hallmarks of my administration.

I will work to eliminate waste wherever it exists at the local level, and I will constantly strive to reduce the cost of government through partnerships, austerity measures, and a disciplined approach based on accountability, transparency and responsibility to the people of Plainfield.

I will listen to you, the people!

Plainfield, the time has come for us to live up to our ideals, for us to realize the tremendous potential of our great City.

I am prepared and ready to be YOUR Mayor, a Mayor who will strive for the attainment of Plainfield’s great purpose.

We will become a city with a stable housing market. Our city will be a highly desirable place to live in, because we have clean streets and well paved roads, and our crime will be greatly reduced.

We will become a City that focuses on the so-called small incidents, such as someone throwing garbage from a car window, or a pedestrian discarding refuse on the streets, or someone speeding through our streets. It has to stop; it’s the small things that become big things.

We will become the City that says NO to these incidents, and one that enforces its litter laws, because we know that if we prevent others from destroying and defacing our City, we would in turn reduce our costs of operation, restore a greater sense of pride in our community and, more importantly, create a deterrent to other situations that can be more costly.

I know first hand the challenges that one must work to overcome in order to be successful.

Many of you may not know that I was raised in a one-parent household in extreme poverty. I know the hard work, dedication, and sacrifices that are essential to move forward in extremely difficult circumstances.

I know firsthand how to overcome a crisis during very difficult and stressful times. Folks, we are in a crisis here in Plainfield.

My vision is that we will become a city that demands of the County, State and Federal Governments all that is owed to us. We, in turn, guarantee that their assets in our community will be properly cared for. We will become a city that understands we are all connected, regardless of economic circumstances that we have shared values.

We will become a city of action, a city that strives for the attainment of its true place as wonderful places to live, work, play and raise our children.

Plainfield is the city I have called home for thirty years. Plainfield is the city where my wonderful partner in life of 30 years, my wife, Amelia, and I raised two wonderful, beautiful daughters, both of whom were born at Muhlenberg Hospital.

Plainfield is the city where I have worshipped for thirty years as a faithful member of St. Mark’s Church.

And Plainfield is the city which I have come to love for its diversity and strong sense of community.

The vision that I have outlined for you today will be cultivated with care, concern, and compassion for your safety and well being; it will be nurtured by the bright rays of sunshine that will pierce the veil of secrecy, to shine the light of transparency on all that we do; it will be watered by the competence and skill of experienced professionals, and it will flourish with the steady hands of my leadership.

But I can’t do it alone; I will need your help. Will you help me? Will you help me take back our city from a failed leadership? Will you help me move our city forward? Will you help me shed the idea that we as a city should not be respected and given our fair share of equitable funding?

I need your help, Plainfield – each and every one of you in this room. I will need you to walk with me in your neighborhoods, to make phone calls and to reach out to everyone that you know. I am ready to lead as your Mayor with you all as my partners.

Thank you for coming out this afternoon and joining me as we get Plainfield back on track. May God bless you and may God bless Plainfield.

Saturday, April 18, 2009

New Dems Campaign Headquarters Opening!

Hello, Friends,

I would like to invite you to the opening of our Campaign Headquarters this afternoon. I will be laying out my vision for Plainfield's Future, and you will be able to meet me and my running mates Rick Smiley (for Assembly), and the Democratic City Committee candidates from YOUR neighborhoods. Be a part of the positive change Plainfield needs!

Plainfield's Grassroots Democratic Movement
Invites You to Get Involved!
Meet the Candidates
Share Our Vision for the Future

Today, April 18th
2:00 - 4:00 PM
New Democrats Campaign Headquarters
117 Watchung Avenue (bet. 2nd & Front Streets)
Refreshments - Music - Voter Registration

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

An Open Invitation to Democrats in Plainfield

Jerry Green just doesn't get it. And it really shows in the way he is managing the Plainfield Democratic City Committee election process. As chairman of the City Committee, Green is showing he hasn't learned one thing from President Barack Obama about openness and transparency as a general policy.

Jerry is continuing the old and worn-out tradition of secretly hand-picking candidates for the committee, whose members are responsible for Democratic party matters at the city level. Every two years, each political party elects candidates at the local level to its municipal committee. This year is the turn of the Democrats. With 34 voting districts in the city and a male and female seat in each district to be filled, there are 68 slots for the city committee, whose candidates appear on the June primary ballot.

Ideally, city committee members are the ones to whom neighborhood Democrats would turn as a first resource for constituent questions and concerns. The committee is also responsible for helping to recruit and vet Democratic candidates for City Council and mayor. In their role as members of the County Democratic committee, members share with others countywide in the election of the County chairperson and the selection and approval of countywide and legislative candidates.

Members are really supposed to be representatives of neighborhood Democrats on the city committee, though under Green's chairmanship the members are given no active role, little advance notice of meetings, and are usually asked to simply rubber stamp decisions made by Green without their input. I think that is a miserable way to do business, and want to offer an alternative, one that is consistent with Barack Obama's commitment to openness and transparency and one that looks to involve new people with new ideas in the political process.

Here is what I propose:

Registered Democrats from throughout the city who are interested in serving on the Democratic City Committee are invited to contact me at amapp4mayor@gmail.com, with their name, address and contact information, and I will provide them with information explaining the duties of membership on the city committee and how to work with the Mapp For Mayor team to bring some sunshine into the process of electing the Democratic City Committee. I look forward to working with you for a better Plainfield!

Regards,

Adrian

Monday, March 16, 2009

Protecting PMUA Frontline Workers: A Clarification

I want to clarify my proposal to reintegrate the PMUA into the City as it concerns the PMUA's frontline workers.

Who are these frontline workers? They are those who work the trucks, clean the shopping districts, run the Transfer Station and process payments.

Here is what I said:

PMUA Executive Director Eric Watson says he laid off 20 of 170 employees, 1 of every 8. These workers had no say in the matter and no union to protect them.

Mr. Watson froze salaries and demanded unpaid furloughs. The workers had no say in the matter and no union to protect them.

Under my plan, frontline PMUA workers would immediately be better off since they would enjoy the protection of the union and would not be subjected to arbitrary layoffs, salary freezes and mandatory furloughs by the PMUA 's Executive Director.

The money saved by eliminating the high-paid executives would be used to make sure the frontline workers won't be sacrificed for the big cats' big salaries.

I would make sure frontline workers are represented on the citizen committee I will appoint to plan the reintegration of the PMUA into the city.

I am dedicated to protecting the interests of Plainfield's taxpayers and the welfare of the frontline employees of the PMUA.

There has been a lot of interest in my proposal, and I will take up some other comments and questions in future posts.

Regards, Adrian

Wednesday, March 11, 2009

Plainfield Must Rein in PMUA Excesses

What would life in Plainfield be like if the Plainfield Municipal Utilities Authority ran the city? That is the question I asked myself after reading about the public's reaction to the PMUA's 20 percent solid waste rate hike in the March 1 Courier-News story ("Plainfield residents, officials questioning rate hikes proposed by Municipal Utilities Authority"). And that is the question on many Plainfield taxpayers' minds as they try to digest this news, coming as it does on top of other stresses and financial difficulties in this time of upheaval in the nation's economy.

Plainfielders want to see some relief; they want fiscal responsibility and restraint on the part of those whose use of the power to tax makes their lives miserable. I have a plan that would bring relief to the taxpayers and attack the problems with the PMUA at their source, a plan that would be advantageous to ratepayers and the PMUA's front-line employees, both of whom have had to take the brunt of this on the chin. It is simply this: abolish the PMUA as a separate quasi-governmental authority and bring the jobs that it does back under the roof of a single city administration. How would this help the ratepayers?

First, we could probably cut out about $1 million in wasteful duplicative salaries and benefits for the PMUA's highly paid "executive board." Taxpayers would also be relieved to the tune of perhaps another $1 million for all the pricey lawyers and engineers whose inflated contracts are the result of New Jersey's corrupt pay-to-play culture.

Secondly, by bringing solid waste collection in-house, with the services covered by the homeowner's property tax bill, as with other essential city services, taxpayers would be able to get a tax break on services for which they must pay under the PMUA but for which they get no tax relief. How would reintegration into the city help PMUA workers? Tough times hit those at the bottom of the totem pole hardest, and the PMUA is no exception. By his own account, PMUA Executive Director Eric Watson says he has laid off 20 of its 170 employees, or nearly 1 in 8 of the work force.

Further, involuntary furloughs have been mandated as well as a salary freeze. The sad thing in all this is that the fate of the unorganized PMUA workers is simply in the hands of the agency's executive director. They have no voice, no seat at the table. As part of the city's work force, the PMUA workers' situation would immediately improve. In the first place, they would be represented by a union that would watch out that fair play was being exercised whenever talk of sacrifice comes up, as it must in these difficult times. The money saved by the elimination of the high-priced executives of the agency would make it more likely that essential services — and the workers who provide them — would not be cut while top executives continued to reap handsome salaries and perks.

There are additional benefits to the taxpayers and the city. Not only will we be able to eliminate duplicative and costly personnel expenses and consultant fees, the city will be able to rationalize the space requirements needed for its public works and solid waste services, freeing up property in the city's prime development corridor for a return to the tax rolls by managed development after the economic recovery which President Barack Obama is determined to bring about.

Further, the PMUA has utterly let the taxpayers of Plainfield down over the past 10 years with its oft-repeated and never-delivered promise of relief through the delivery of its services to other communities via shared-services agreements. While it could have done much to soften the rate increases on its own base over the years by gradually expanding its services through offering its expertise and state-of-the-art equipment to other towns, the story of the PMUA leadership has been one of ""talking the talk" but not ""walking the walk."

As everyone knows, I am a Democratic candidate for mayor, an office the voters of the Queen City will fill in this November's general election. Plainfield desperately needs leaders who will bring both fiscal responsibility and competence to the table. The first thing I will do as mayor of Plainfield will be to appoint a committee of citizens and taxpayers representative of the entire city to plan the orderly reintegration of the PMUA into the city's operations. As for "sacred cows" like the PMUA, nothing should fail to be scrutinized when it comes to giving taxpayers some relief. As the PMUA's Watson said to me recently, "It's just business."

Now, if PMUA Board Chairperson Carol Brokaw or Watson have a better plan, let them put it forward immediately, as the lack of transparency in the PMUA's workings, which echoes that of the current administration, has led to a complete loss of confidence on the part of our residents. The same goes for Assemblyman Jerry Green and Mayor Sharon Robinson-Briggs.

The people of Plainfield are, I am sure, all ears.

Regards, Adrian

Monday, March 9, 2009

A Mapp for Mayor

In January of this year, I announced my candidacy for the office of Mayor of Plainfield. In this blog, I will lay out my campaign platform and offer my insights on how I will work to make Plainfield shine once again as the Queen City. As the Third Ward Councilman, however, I will still maintain my Plainfield City Council blog, which focuses on my legislative role as the council representative for Third Ward residents.

Regards, Adrian