Friday, May 15, 2009

On Crime and Public Safety

This post is also published on my 3rd Ward Council blog, "Mapping It Out," as I felt that it deserved posting there as well. Many of you have expressed frustration about the lack of communication from the mayor as well as outrage about her attempt to govern with "hugs" and "kisses," but no meaningful action.

Statistics produced by the Union County Prosecutor's Office just last month show that crime is UP 12.4% in Plainfield.* This is shameful, and speaks to the current administration's empty talk on crime and safety.

I know first-hand how crime affects us all. As I walk through the streets of Plainfield, listening to you, the voters, it is clear that the current administration under Sharon is deaf to your serious concerns about your own safety.

There is a misconception being perpetrated by my opponent that my goal is to reduce the police department. Nothing could be further from the truth. The truth is, we have less police on the force than 3 ½ years ago, when this mayor came into office. In addition, more losses were caused by the fact that the mayor had officers personally assigned to her for her use for 3 years—meaning even less officers available for crime-fighting!

As your mayor, I will fight crime like never before! My goal is to add additional police officers to city streets by bringing the complement of officers up to 160. I will use the savings that will result from attrition and retirements and funds available under President Obama’s Federal Stimulus program to accomplish this goal.

For example, up to $1 billion in funding from President Obama’s American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 was made available through the COPS (Community Oriented Policing Services) to address the personnel needs of state, local, and tribal law enforcement.

The funding, through COPS Hiring Recovery Program (CHRP) goes directly to law enforcement agencies to create and preserve jobs and to increase community policing capacity and crime-prevention efforts through the hiring and rehiring of law enforcement officers.

The grant would have provided 100 percent funding for salaries and benefits for 3 years for newly-hired, full-time sworn officer positions (including filling existing unfunded vacancies) or for rehired officers who have been laid off, or are scheduled to be laid off on a future date, as a result of local budget cuts.

Unfortunately, the current administration dropped the ball and did not apply for this competitive grant! The deadline, April 14, 2009, has passed!

This is truly unfortunate, because there was no local matching fund requirement, meaning no additional tax burden on you, the taxpayer. In addition, no cap was placed on the number of positions we could have requested for funding!

Under a Mapp administration, we will apply for ALL available funding to increase safety and improve crime prevention! We will make sure that every dollar allocated for crime fighting is spent on crimefighting. Working with our police, we must tackle drug dealing, assaults, home invasions, car break-ins, and all other criminal activity. We must be vigilant.

We’ve had enough empty talk from the current administration about crime. We will not drop the ball and ignore the needs of our residents as the current mayor has done. We will not place our heads in the sand. Under Sharon, crime has steadily increased.

It’s time for action! It’s time for change!


*Source: Star-Ledger, 4/21/09 “New statistics show crime surge in Union County last year”: In Plainfield, second in the county to Elizabeth in total number of crimes...crime rose 12.4% percent.” Statistics provided by the Uniform Police Report to the Union County Prosecutor's Office.

Friday, May 8, 2009

PMUA and Jerry Green

Dear friends,

I have been receiving a great deal of correspondence from residents who are supportive of my plan to rein in expenses at PMUA, along with questions as to why Jerry Green has resorted to unsubstantiated lies in order to defame my character.

I find it perplexing that, instead of dealing with the unprecedented 20% plus rate increase at PMUA and the questionable expenses related to a recent trip to California made by several commissioners and executives that we as PMUA ratepayers are funding, Jerry Green has instead decided to engage in libel about what was said at a meeting with PMUA Director Eric Watson.

Director Watson has not contacted me about the assemblyman's lies, although Green's blog post implies that Watson told him what was said at this meeting. Watson has not publicly come out to validate Green's lies or to correct the record, so I must. I would hope that Director Watson would make clear his role, if any, in Green's melodrama.

With the kind permission of its author, what follows is sample correspondence from one of the emails I received from a PMUA ratepayer who has become very concerned about Jerry Green's recent attack on me. My final response, sent yesterday, is immediately below:

Re: In Plainfield, it costs more to flush than to drink...pee water v. potable water‏
From: Adrian Mapp (amapp4mayor@gmail.com)
Sent: Thu 5/07/09 1:19 AM
To: Sandro La Rosa
(sandro.larosa@gmail.com)

Sandro:

Assembly Green will do everything he can to spread lies and misinformation about me over the course of the next 4 weeks. I can assure you that I made no such promise to Mr. Watson.

Everything Jerry said is a lie; I stand by my very public position on the PMUA; I am a man of my word. Please do not allow Mr. Green's attempt to tarnish my credibility and reputation to succeed.

There will be many of these attacks during the next 26 days, please reject them. When I met with Mr. Watson I did so with Annie McWilliams and Nat Singleton; they can attest to the fact that no such offer was ever made. Fortunately I never meet with anyone by myself.

Having said the above I will say the following: In 2005 my late friend and former mayor Al Mcwilliams was attacked repeatedly by Mr. Green and he spent a lot of energy responding to those attacks instead of focusing his energy and resources on his opponent, Sharon.

It was a big mistake. Al lost the election. Jerry's strategy worked. With all due respect, I have no plans to engage Jerry or to respond to his lies, I will remain focused.

I am running against Sharon not against Jerry. I need your help in order to defeat her and to be in a position to bring positive change to Plainfield.

That said, rest assured that I remain true to my stated goal of reining in the PMUA and lifting the burden that it places on all of the property owners in Plainfield.

I have no allegiance to Mr. Watson, my allegiance and commitment is to you and to the rest of Plainfield. I don't owe Mr. Watson anything and I did not promise him anything but, I will promise you this, with your support I will rein in the PMUA.

Regards,
Adrian


On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Sandro La Rosa <sandro.larosa@gmail.com> wrote:

Adrian:I came across this piece by Assemblyman Jerry Greenhttp://jerrygreenspage.blogspot.com/2009/04/city-committee-chairmanship-up-for-sale.html

Mr. Green writes"A few months ago, Adrian Mapp met with the Director of the PMUA, EricWatson. Adrian Mapp solicited to Mr. Watson that if he [Watson]encouraged the election of Adrian Mapp for Mayor, he would not only close his eyes to PMUA’s problems, but would also support Watson as the new Chairman of the Democratic Party of the City of Plainfield. "These are grave accusations, given your public position on the PMUA.

I believe that many Plainfield citizens are fed up with the PMUA and are willing to support you in the upcoming elections for Mayor, given your past statements on your willingness to rein on the PMUA. We found the allegation raised by Mr. Green very disturbing and expect you to strongly rebuke this accusation.

Thank you for your attention and best regards, Sandro

On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Adrian Mapp <amapp4mayor@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello Sandro:

Thank you for your email and the copy of the letter you sent to the PMUA. Rest assured that as mayor I will be looking at the overall cost structure of the PMUA with a view towards reducing its financial burden on tax payers. Again, thanks for the feedback.

Regards, Adrian

On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Sandro La Rosa <sandro.larosa@gmail.com wrote:

Dear Mr. Mapp:

I read with interest your OpEd on the PMUA http://www.mycentraljersey.com/article/20090310/OPINION04/903100339/1063 and I am fully suppostive of your proposal to dismantle the PMUA, eliminate redundant and costly layers of management, rationalize the service, and - as a result - provide much-needed relief to the workers and to the Plainfield rate/tax-payers. As for the current burden to the tax payers, I noticed that you focused mainly on the solid waste issues. I wanted you to be aware that I found another major problem, having to do with the absurd sewer fee charged by the PMUA. For details, you may want to read the attached letter I sent to PMUA in February - not replied yet - after finding out that flush water in Plainfield costs 170% of potable water. It took me a while to figure this out because PMUA does not disclose the measurement unit of their sewer rate. I eventually was able to calculate back that these are $/hundred ft3. In my case, I have to pay $5.78 for sewer v. $3.36/100 ft3 I paid on average to my water supply company. As my visiting daughter pointed out, "If sewer water in Plainfield is so precious, maybe I should start drinking from the toilet." It sounds comical but I believe it is a very serious issue for Plainfield residents.

Best regards, Sandro

End Correspondence

Folks,

I am running against the current mayor and her record of failed leadership. I am running against wasteful spending and mismanagement at City Hall and PMUA.

I am running for Mayor to restore transparency, fiscal accountability, and stable taxes to our city.

With your support, we can change the negative, divisive, unethical "Jerry Green-style politics" of lies and polarization.

Regards,

Adrian


On June 2, you can make a change.
Vote Column F
Mapp for Mayor
Smiley for Assembly
New Democrats City Committee Candidates

Monday, May 4, 2009

My Take on Muhlenberg Hospital

Last year, while campaigning on behalf of Barack Obama and the New Democrats for Plainfield, we laid out an approach to saving Muhlenberg Hospital. As I walk through your neighborhoods, meeting with you and hearing your concerns, Muhlenberg comes up frequently. Although the hospital has closed, there is no reason it cannot be reopened immediately as a full-service facility. I thought that now would be an opportune time to remind us all of what can and should be done:

Muhlenberg Regional Medical Center is a medical, economic, and social centerpiece of the Plainfield community. It is a medical institution highly regarded by its patients and by the medical professional community. The state commission appointed by Governor John Corzine for “Rationalizing Health Care” clearly identified Muhlenberg as an essential hospital serving a community with great needs, in contrast to other hospital service areas that have more beds than are being used. This commission recommends using state funding to support hospitals like Muhlenberg while closing hospitals that are less needed.

In order to save Muhlenberg and the essential medical services it provides, solutions must address root causes, i.e., the 1.5 million New Jersey residents who lack any form of medical insurance. The greater Plainfield area has a significant portion of New Jersey’s uninsured, and most of them need insurance, not only to pay for inpatient care, but more importantly, to pay for preventative, wellness, and primary outpatient care. More insured residents will result in less unnecessary and expensive emergency room visits and less inpatient care. This is the future of medicine and Muhlenberg should be the focal point for these new trends in medicine.

Muhlenberg can continue to be a leader for medical services to those who desperately need them. We need to take the following steps to make this happen:
  • State government should provide cash infusion of $18 million from the charity care account for a one-year period to give Muhlenberg time for more lasting solutions. This is in the spirit of the state’s commission on Rationalizing Health Care.
  • Along this line, a hospital stabilization fund must be created to save distressed but essential NJ hospitals. Muhlenberg must be the first participant in this fund.
  • State Senator Vitale’s Universal Healthcare legislation should be fast-tracked to provide all New Jerseyans with the healthcare we need and deserve. All legislators serving the Muhlenberg community should sign on as co-sponsors of this bill.
  • Charity Care funding must be used rationally. This can only be done if hospital financial records are readily available for public scrutiny, so as to make community hospitals such as Muhlenberg transparent and accountable to the community.
  • Annual Financial Statements must be provided in a timely manner to any citizen who requests them. Additionally, annual public hearings for each NJ hospital should be required for full disclosure of its financial position.
  • Charity care fund distribution should include reimbursements to reward efficiency and quality. This will clearly benefit Muhlenberg.

We know what it will take to save Muhlenberg.

What is needed is the political will to do it.
Regards, Adrian

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Column F: Leadership for Plainfield's Future

Dear Friends,

A judge has decided the outcome of our court case. The New Democrats for Plainfield City Committee Candidates and I will be allowed to be bracketed with Rick Smiley, Assembly Candidate.

In addition, the City Clerk's decision on the petition challenges we filed was upheld. We have received clarification, and will now move forward!

New Democrats for Plainfield

COLUMN F

Leadership for Plainfield's

FUTURE!

Monday, April 27, 2009

Towards a Fair Democratic Election Process









Dear Friends,

This morning, I appeared in court to receive a final ruling on issues that came up at the beginning of the primary process. One issue was the issue of bracketing, which Dan Damon wrote about in his blog. The New Democrats for Plainfield wanted to be bracketed to run with some other reform candidates, so there was a hearing with Judge William Wertheimer, who presided.

The other issue had to do with making sure that the petitions filed by all candidates for Plainfield Mayor (myself included!) met the legal requirements set forth by New Jersey election law statutes. As you all know, the petition process is designed so that voters can be assured that the candidates running for an election adhere to the same democratic process and to ensure fairness for all. In addition, the process of getting valid signatures is meant to ensure that no legal voter is disenfranchised.

After the City Clerk received the signed petitions, she notified the candidates regarding all deadlines relating to the ballot, letting us know that if we had questions or concerns about any of the signatures of voters and others who signed the petitions, we had note them and get them to her so that she could check them.
I went over the petitions of my opponents, just as I am sure they went over mine, and I submitted some challenges. It is the Clerk's responsibility to respond to petition questions from the candidates. After her review, the Clerk upheld some my challenges, as some registered Republicans had signed some of the pink-colored Democratic petitions given to them by candidates (the Republican petitions are blue), and there were a few unregistered voters who had signed in error. For the other challenges, the Clerks said said that a judge would have to make a final ruling if there were still questions.

One question that I had was whether unaffiliated (also known as Non-Partisan) voters could sign partisan petitions to run for City Committee and to be counted as valid on a partisan primary petition; the Clerk had indicated to me that unaffiliated voters had to sign a party affiliation form and attach it to the petition. One of our city committee candidates did this, per the Clerk’s advice. Later, the Clerk noted that by signing a partisan petition (Democratic or Republican Party), the voter was declaring his or her party affiliation, per New Jersey election statutes. I am glad that this was clarified.

Another clarification we needed had to do with petitioners who had neglected to sign their names, per the Clerk's instructions, as well as some whose signatures appeared similar. Although Judge Wertheimer noted some of the similarities and expressed his own concerns about the handwriting on a couple of petitions, he stipulated that, as he was not a handwriting expert, and no handwriting expert was present in court, he would accept the oaths signed by and sworn to by the candidates.

A final issue that came up is one of grave concern to me. When one of the other candidates spoke to the judge, he rightly noted that some of the County Clerk’s lists were outdated, as one of his family members (who IS registered) was listed as “not a registered voter” by the City Clerk. Now, I have known this candidate and his family for over twenty years. He has been an elected official and he and his family are longtime residents of Plainfield, so I found it difficult to believe that a family member of his would be unregistered.

Because of the outdated lists, however, there is a danger that other Plainfield voters, like the voter mentioned above, will now have to get their names reregistered with the Clerk. The lists need to be updated so that this mistake doesn’t happen in the future. We want to make sure that no voter is disenfranchised.

I am glad that we received these rulings by Judge Wertheimer, as all of us running for elective office can feel secure knowing that these two rulings are final. With that said, I look forward to a vigorous and challenging campaign season!

New Democrats for Plainfield
COLUMN F
Leadership for Plainfield's
FUTURE!

Regards,

Adrian

Friday, April 24, 2009

My Vision for Plainfield



Friends, below is the text of the remarks I made at the grand opening of Plainfield's New Democrats for Plainfield Headquarters last Saturday, April 18, 2009.



Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for coming out this afternoon. I realize that your time is precious and I feel blessed that you took the time to be with me at this important juncture in the history of the city of Plainfield.

Many of you in this room have asked me why I have decided to run for the position of Mayor. And I say to you that I am running for mayor of Plainfield because the city is in crisis. It needs a leader with the experience, qualification, track record and vision to lead it out of the dark days of a failed leadership under the current administration: a failed leadership that has brought the city three years of economic stagnation, three years of benign neglect of its infrastructure, and three years of bad personnel choices incapable of managing the fiscal affairs of this city, incapable of delivering quality core services, and incapable of responding to the needs of citizens in these very harsh economic times.

I am running for mayor to address these and other issues affecting Plainfield. I have the experience and expertise to do so—I hold an M.B.A. in International Business, a Bachelor’s Degree in Accounting, and I am a Certified Municipal Finance Officer.

Ladies and gentlemen, I have a vision for Plainfield that will be built from the ground up—not from the top down. So, I would like to take some time today to highlight where I, as Mayor, will take the city of Plainfield.

Plainfield is blessed with having highly capable employees who are seriously interested and committed to moving the City forward through their daily efforts. However, due to the lack of leadership, they are not being heard. This has hurt the city tremendously, because it is the frontline employees who are often in the best position to identify cost savings and to suggest changes that can benefit the City.

As Mayor, my administration will utilize the employees of the City as partners in Government, for many of them are also residents of Plainfield, and they truly wish to see a more prosperous city. This is where their primary investment, their homes, will appreciate in value.

My administration will empower the city employees to implement changes that are beneficial to the city and will create faster response times to addressing issues plaguing the city.

My administration will not be the dictatorial form of government that is practiced by the current Mayor in Plainfield today; my government will be inclusive of ALL people. A strong and effective government is one that is built on CONSENSUS. Great leaders, from Abraham Lincoln to President Barack Obama, believed in the involvement of the ordinary citizen and worker towards the creation of a more sound and responsive government.

That is what Good leadership and good government looks like. That is what I will be as the Mayor. Real change can come to Plainfield, but it requires REAL leadership. I will provide that leadership with you as my partner, as my team member, and certainly as my check and balance.

I will create a plan for economic development that is not developer driven, and for the first time in this city’s history I will develop and implement an aggressive marketing plan using the mass media to enhance Plainfield’s image, making it more desirable to targeted investors who will want to make Plainfield a business destination.

But I will not focus solely on attracting new businesses; I want to retain the ones that are already here. I want to give them a reason to stay and to expand. So, I am proposing the creation of a Commercial Tax Abatement Program that will not alter the underlying assessment, yet will provide a very attractive incentive over a five year period that will encourage existing businesses to expand, thus creating jobs and expanding the city’s commercial tax base to enhance its tax revenues.

I strongly believe that the Transit Village initiative can be the lynchpin for downtown revitalization and consequently the revitalization of Plainfield. The Transit Village will allow us to increase the density of housing and businesses in areas already well-served by public transportation.

Couple this with a long term initiative to encourage artists, crafts people and small businesses to make use of the under-utilized loft-type structures already existing within the proximity of Plainfield’s downtown transit zone, and we have the makings of a critical mass of self-sustaining activities and development that will restore vitality to Plainfield’s downtown while at the same time providing the city with an ever-increasing tax base of new ratables.

I will initiate a new study of all Brownfield structures within the city, using grant funds, and establish a plan that rehabilitates and converts all of the Brownfield structures, mainly concentrated in the 4th Ward, into retail shopping outlets.

I recognize that these are very challenging fiscal times for all municipalities, but I also believe that we as a community can and must take every step necessary to position the City for success when the nation comes out of this difficult time.
The city should not and I will not place all of our eggs in one development basket, as a city we must broaden our approach and our outreach. This I plan to do.

I will focus as much of the city’s resources to rebuilding, improving and enhancing our infrastructure—our roads, IT network, and aging buildings, and I will aggressively seek and demand funding from the County, State and Federal governments to assist us in this effort.

Moving forward, I will work to modernize Information Technology (IT); it must be brought into the 21st century, it has to be made more efficient and citizen friendly. By automating the city records and putting them on-line, using wireless, the Web and GPS, we can make doing the city’s business, easier, faster, and less expensive for citizens, businesses and employees.

By embracing renewables, Plainfield will be able to significantly reduce its carbon footprint. My colleague Cory Storch has long been an advocate for hybrid vehicles. Well, Cory, I’ve got a plan for you. My plan, where feasible, will be to migrate the city’s fleet of vehicles to hybrid gas and electric, all electric and biodiesel; install solar panels on city buildings; encourage citizens through the use of targeted initiatives to embrace renewables, thus reducing their carbon footprint.

We can partner with the school system to make sure our kids learn the technology that will enable them to take advantage of the new jobs created in the renewable industry. This is a serious commitment, one that will ultimately drive down costs and result in more citizens embracing their environmental stewardship.

There is a misconception out there being perpetrated that my goal is to reduce the police department. Well, nothing could be further from the truth. My goal is to add additional police officers to city streets by bringing the complement of officers up to 160. I will use the savings that will result from attrition and retirements and funds available under President Obama’s Federal Stimulus program to accomplish this goal.

My administration will focus on quality of life issues such as drugs and crime, traffic safety, enforcement of property maintenance codes, and neighborhood safety and appearance.

The PMUA is an issue that is on many peoples’ minds, as it should be. Higher assessments mean less money in your pocket. I am not here to attack the PMUA or its great employees. However, as your Mayor, I will appoint a commission to explore the feasibility of bringing the PMUA under the umbrella of city government. My goal is to utilize economies of scale that would help to reduce operating costs, provide additional tax deductions to property owners, and protect frontline employees.

Across America, cities are finding ways to save money, and they are doing this by identifying city services best suited for shared service partnerships, shared services that will seek out balanced partnerships with local governmental entities, neighboring municipalities and with the county.

For example, the city’s Municipal Court, its 9-1-1 dispatch system, its regular phone system, and the Tax Collector’s office are some of the areas where opportunities for shared services exist.

It doesn’t mean that people will lose their jobs. What it means is that we are using the resources of this city in a more thoughtful and efficient manner, and perhaps opening up a long neglected opportunity to bring in money to the city.

Here’s where everyone can get involved in moving Plainfield forward. In my first one hundred days, I will establish focus groups that will be charged with the responsibility of reaching across the city to hear what all the citizens of Plainfield envision in their city. I will ask them about their vision for the city and their assistance to move Plainfield forward.

Secondly, I will appoint a Census Commission to work on getting an accurate count of our city’s population. The goal would be to exceed 50,000 citizens – I know that we have that many Plainfielders; we just have to make sure that they are counted.

By exceeding the 50,000 mark, we, as a city, control the funding that Plainfield is rightly due, as a city we would no longer be beholden to any outside forces. The phrase that comes to mind is Plainfield for Plainfield.

The residents of Plainfield are homeowners and renters. Some of our residents work in the city of Plainfield while others travel great distances to earn their wages. What every resident of Plainfield wants is a well-functioning city that understands the value of the hard earned dollar that they make and, as such, treat the taxes raised through property taxes and the taxes receive in the form of municipal aid as a sacred trust that should be expended with discipline and in a fiduciary manner.

I will use my financial background to restore fiscal stability, integrity and accountability to the city’s finances.

As a fellow resident of Plainfield, I appreciate the great potential of this City. However, I believe it is time we make that great potential a reality.

We deserve a progressive, forward-thinking government that understands how to make smart financial decisions that benefit of the City.

My experience as a Certified Public Accountant, as an Associate Director of Finance, and as a Municipal Finance Officer has taught me how to analyze the financial conditions of both cities and businesses to provide financial solutions to help them attain their goals while adhering to their budgets.

As Mayor, my administration will create a budget that incorporates the pressing needs of the city, such as road repairs, and address those needs in the budget that prepared by the administration.

We will prioritize expenditures, based on the benefits they provide to citizens, and not be afraid to make the hard choices.

As mayor, I will seek out and take advantage of all available resources at the county, state and federal levels to benefit the people of Plainfield.

I will surround myself with competent local talent and I will work to create a culture of volunteerism and responsibility on the part of city employees and citizens all across the city.

As mayor, I will work to make courtesy, professionalism and respect the hallmarks of my administration.

I will work to eliminate waste wherever it exists at the local level, and I will constantly strive to reduce the cost of government through partnerships, austerity measures, and a disciplined approach based on accountability, transparency and responsibility to the people of Plainfield.

I will listen to you, the people!

Plainfield, the time has come for us to live up to our ideals, for us to realize the tremendous potential of our great City.

I am prepared and ready to be YOUR Mayor, a Mayor who will strive for the attainment of Plainfield’s great purpose.

We will become a city with a stable housing market. Our city will be a highly desirable place to live in, because we have clean streets and well paved roads, and our crime will be greatly reduced.

We will become a City that focuses on the so-called small incidents, such as someone throwing garbage from a car window, or a pedestrian discarding refuse on the streets, or someone speeding through our streets. It has to stop; it’s the small things that become big things.

We will become the City that says NO to these incidents, and one that enforces its litter laws, because we know that if we prevent others from destroying and defacing our City, we would in turn reduce our costs of operation, restore a greater sense of pride in our community and, more importantly, create a deterrent to other situations that can be more costly.

I know first hand the challenges that one must work to overcome in order to be successful.

Many of you may not know that I was raised in a one-parent household in extreme poverty. I know the hard work, dedication, and sacrifices that are essential to move forward in extremely difficult circumstances.

I know firsthand how to overcome a crisis during very difficult and stressful times. Folks, we are in a crisis here in Plainfield.

My vision is that we will become a city that demands of the County, State and Federal Governments all that is owed to us. We, in turn, guarantee that their assets in our community will be properly cared for. We will become a city that understands we are all connected, regardless of economic circumstances that we have shared values.

We will become a city of action, a city that strives for the attainment of its true place as wonderful places to live, work, play and raise our children.

Plainfield is the city I have called home for thirty years. Plainfield is the city where my wonderful partner in life of 30 years, my wife, Amelia, and I raised two wonderful, beautiful daughters, both of whom were born at Muhlenberg Hospital.

Plainfield is the city where I have worshipped for thirty years as a faithful member of St. Mark’s Church.

And Plainfield is the city which I have come to love for its diversity and strong sense of community.

The vision that I have outlined for you today will be cultivated with care, concern, and compassion for your safety and well being; it will be nurtured by the bright rays of sunshine that will pierce the veil of secrecy, to shine the light of transparency on all that we do; it will be watered by the competence and skill of experienced professionals, and it will flourish with the steady hands of my leadership.

But I can’t do it alone; I will need your help. Will you help me? Will you help me take back our city from a failed leadership? Will you help me move our city forward? Will you help me shed the idea that we as a city should not be respected and given our fair share of equitable funding?

I need your help, Plainfield – each and every one of you in this room. I will need you to walk with me in your neighborhoods, to make phone calls and to reach out to everyone that you know. I am ready to lead as your Mayor with you all as my partners.

Thank you for coming out this afternoon and joining me as we get Plainfield back on track. May God bless you and may God bless Plainfield.

Saturday, April 18, 2009

New Dems Campaign Headquarters Opening!

Hello, Friends,

I would like to invite you to the opening of our Campaign Headquarters this afternoon. I will be laying out my vision for Plainfield's Future, and you will be able to meet me and my running mates Rick Smiley (for Assembly), and the Democratic City Committee candidates from YOUR neighborhoods. Be a part of the positive change Plainfield needs!

Plainfield's Grassroots Democratic Movement
Invites You to Get Involved!
Meet the Candidates
Share Our Vision for the Future

Today, April 18th
2:00 - 4:00 PM
New Democrats Campaign Headquarters
117 Watchung Avenue (bet. 2nd & Front Streets)
Refreshments - Music - Voter Registration